ELECTIONS COURT PROCEEDINGS FRIDAY 9th JUNE 2023
INEC lawyer is up
SAN Pinhero; My lord, we are indifferent about playing this flash drive
It’s already admitted into evidence.
Ahn Ahn
INEC don give up π€£π π€£
Everyone is laughing
APC Lawyers: We stand with our colleagues to object to this flash drive being played so that we can go back to watch it.
We have not played it yet to know the content and we would need to prepare for cross examination.
This evidence should not be played
APC Objection objection all the time.
They even objected to the form that announced their candidate yesterdayπ€£
The LP legal team just set up a presentation monitor to play a recording of Mahmood Yakubu’s speech for the judges.
The court is going to be π₯ today!
Court today is going to be very dramatic.
Labour Party came in with not just offering boxes today, ladies and gentlemen, I saw hefty men dragging big screensπ
What is all thisπ
INEC why did you start this problem for yourselves
I don’t know what Peter Obi and Labour Party are planning today.
The judges are now seated and staring at the big screens in the courtroom
ππ π
‘Some people said they don’t have laptops yesterday, so Peter Ono has brought big one for them today, let them be seeing the action 4D π€£’
The clerk is now calling the case.
Justice Adah is still staring at the screensππ π
Clerk: Case between Peter GRINGORRY Obi and Labour Party against INEC, Tinubu, Shettima and APC
‘The whole court is laughing, which one is GRINGORRY againπ’.
Peter Obi is now up on his feet
Peter Obi: Respectfully my lord, I am Peter GRE-GO-RY Obi for the petitioners
‘Everyone is laughing
Thank you oh, pronounce the name for them properlyπ ’
Saturday Monsiegne - Deputy Director, Legal Services, APC
Lead Counsels:
Labour Party: SAN Livy
INEC: SAN Pinhero
Tinubu and Shettima: SAN Olujimi
APC: SAN Bashorun
Some of the Peter Obi and Labour Party lawyers introduced by SAN Livy today to assist in the hearing:
Labour Party has just called out a witness.
The witness was subpoenaed
He is from Channels Television
Channels TV is a witness right now.
SAN Livy: My lord we intend to start today by calling a witness who is on a subpoena and I’d hand over to SAN Okutepa while SAN Ikwueto will lead the technical team and software presentation.
SAN Ikwueto: My Lord, we have 2 sets of subpoenas that were served channels TV and I would start with that witness that came on subpoena and he came with his witness statements of oath which we have filed
The witness is now on his feet
Clerk: Tell the court your name
Witness: Lucky Obewox is my name
The witness has now been sworn on oath.
SAN Okutepa: My lord this witness was subpoenaed on 30th May 2023 and 6th June 2023.
Witness do you have the 2 subpoena
Channels TV: Yea Sir
SAN Okutepa: Where are they
Channels TV: They are here with me
SAN Ikwueto: My lord we seek to tender the 2 subpoena addressed to the MD/CEO of Channels TV addressed on the 2 dates issued by these honourable court
All the respondents have objected to this witness subpoenaed.
Tinubu and Shettima: Our objection is based on the competence of this witness to testify on this proceedings.
Our objection isinvested on the provision of the electoral act
Paragraph 4 and 5 of the 4th schedule to the electoral act
My lord it is settled that a petition must be filed within 21 days on the result of an election.
My lord, the document that should accompany a petition should have been filed and the petition must be accompanied with the witness statements and oaths and copies of evidence to be relied on for that petition. And a petition that fails to have this shall not be accepted by the secretary for filing.
This witness is not even competent to testify in this proceeding.
‘Channels TV, Tinubu’s lawyer said you have incompetent witnessπ’
Maybe Channels TV should have brought their other staff, Apapaπ’.
The Subpoena has been admitted by the court and tagged as exhibits
Currently in the courtroom INEC, Tinubu, Shettima and APC’s lawyers are objecting to the Channels TV witness.
His testimony has not been adopted by the court because all the respondents are objecting to it.l, stating the testimony should have been filed earlier.
INEC lawyers are currently arguing using past case.
INEC: My lord the case of PDP Vs Okupo which learned colleague SAN Livy was also involved, a ruling was passed like this.
Justice Tsammani: How does it matter who was in the case you’re citing, you’re wasting time, we want to watch film (he then pointed at the big screens)
π€£π€£π€£
Everyone is still laughing.
APC: My lord, there is no difference between subpoenaed witness and ordinary witness.
I join my colleagues to object and cite some cases like ADP Vs INEC
Justice Tsammani: You’re wasting time, you’re citing what has been cited already. There’s no time.
APC: I want my lordship not to adopt the application of this witness and it should be refused. The timing for his testimony has elapsed.
SAN Ikwueto: Subpeona my lord is an order of court issued to the witness either plaintiff or petitioner has no command over.
On, paragraph 41 sub paragraph 5 and 6 of the first schedule to the Electoral Act 2022 to submit with respect that even when a witness statement was not frontloaded with the petition, the witness can be allowed to testify in this honourable court.
SAN Okutepa: This witness is before this court on subpeona and by the authority of LASU Vs Owoyemi 2009 Nigeria weekly report
At this point the APC lawyers are correcting his pronunciation of Owoyemi and the correcting the year
π€£π π€£
SAN Okutepa: My lord you see they know it and they didn’t cite it and they didn’t want to cite it. They know it oh
Justice Tsammani: It was cited yesterday so even if they hide it I already know it.
π€£π€£π€£
SAN Okutepa: LASU Vs Owoyemi
Justice Tsammani: You say LASU and what
SAN Okutepa: Owoyemi
Justice Tsammani: I thought you said Okutepa
π€£π€£π€£
Everyone is laughing
SAN Okutepa: My lord I don’t have a case yet
I also want to cite Tajudeen Bello Vs Odofin 2021 Law Pavilion Electronic Report
Also in the case of Amachree Vs INEC the court held that no witness should be held back when subpoenaed.
A subpoenaed witness by authority can testify orally and if then does not reduce it to written to be adopted, what injury would we suffer
No injury would be suffered and my lord should overrule this objection and to hold that this is technicality taking too far and they are doing so to run away from the punishment they know they are to suffer.
SAN Okutepa: INEC Chairman was speaking about this thing and
Justice Tsammani cuts him short
No stop that, are you telling us what the witness want to tell us
SAN Okutepa: No it’s public knowledge that’s why they are all objecting like this, they are hiding from the punishment of those statements
Justice Tsammani: Please don’t say that.
SAN Okutepa: Oni and Fayemi 2019 Supreme Court stated that rules of court cannot override the right of fair hearing
About 219 witnesses came on subpeona to testify.
This witness is competent and can testify on subpeona and my lord should allow us to proceed.
Thank you my lord.
Currently there’s a huge argument about listening to the Channels TV witness.
All the respondents are actively objecting.
We have been listening to objection reasons since the court started up until now.
Wahala in the courtroom
APC: My learned colleague has cited a wrong thing and should be held in professional misconduct
The whole court shouted ahhhhhh
Justice Tsammani: Please don’t say such. Stop it. That’s why I said we should move on.
SAN Okutepa is now on his feet
SAN Okutepa: My lord permit me to state my objection
APC: I am still standing sit down.
SAN Okutepa: But I am standing to State my objection
APC: You should know your senior and sit down when your senior is up
Everyone in the court: AAARRRHHHHHH
Justice Tsammani: What is that. How would you say such
Don’t say such
Justice Ugo: You’re his senior then you should know you’re supposed to sit when an objection is being raised
Everyone in the court:
Oh ohhhh
Justice Adah: You should know you will sit during an objection.
Justice Ugo: Please let’s maintain peace. This court case would finish and go but the both of you would still remain here as learned counsels.
Don’t disrespect yourselves because of a case.
Oh ohhhh thank you
APC elder lawyer, you’re everyone’s senior well done oh,
SAN Ancestor π.
The judges have now stated they would give their judgement on this case at final hearing.
And asked that the witness goes ahead.
SAN Okutepa has asked the witness to present his evidence.
The witness brings out 2 red flash drives.
INEC: My learned colleague is giving me red flash drive instead of blue like my Chelsea.
SAN Okutepa: I know Pinhero is a Chelsea fan so he can have a red one like my Arsenal.
Justice Tsammani: You should have given him blue for Chelsea
SAN Okutepa: That’s why I gave him red card.
Justice Tsammani: But both of you are still losers, both Chelsea and Arsenal didn’t even win anything
π€£π π€£
Stray bullet have hit Chelsea and Arsenal fans today, losers association
π π€£π
Justice Tsammani: Number 2 and number 18
Losers association π€£π π€£
The flash drive’s temdered by the Channels TV witness was not objected to by INEC, Tinubu, Shettima and APC
That’s a surprise. They did not object to the admissibility of this evidence
π
SAN Okutepa has now applied to play the flash drives.
Time for movie
Somebody should tag INEC and tag Festus Okoye to say cheeeeeese
Hold on, Tinubu’s lawyers are up
SAN Olujimi: My lord objection
I object to this flash drive being played
π€£π π€£
Wahala
What’s all this na π€£
Objection Objection Objection all the time
INEC lawyer is up
SAN Pinhero; My lord, we are indifferent about playing this flash drive
It’s already admitted into evidence.
Ahn Ahn
INEC don give up π€£π π€£
Everyone is laughing
APC Lawyers: We stand with our colleagues to object to this flash drive being played so that we can go back to watch it.
We have not played it yet to know the content and we would need to prepare for cross examination.
This evidence should not be played
APC Objection objection all the time.
They even objected to the form that announced their candidate yesterdayπ€£
APC, Tinubu and Shettima lawyers are currently objecting to the video presented by Channels TV to be played.
APC: We need to be served first before you play the video. This is an ambush
SAN Okutepa: There’s no law that states such.
My lord, we can move on and see what the witness wants us to see.
SAN Okutepa has cited the court to Geo Memorial Medical Center Vs National Directorate of Employment 2013
Justice Tsammani: That case does not apply.
SAN Okutepa: My lord it does.
Justice Adah: It doesn’t apply to this situation
SAN Okutepa: My lord, it applies because the respondent is saying we can’t play
Justice Bolaji: Learned silk, you’re not listening. We have said it doesn’t apply but you’re still insisting
Okay
Justice Tsamamni: Evwn if, the time is far spent. We can’t do anything anymore today.
SAN Okutepa: As the court pleases my lord
Justice Tsammani has just ruled that if not for time today, the video would have been played.
So the video from Channels TV witness was not played and the witness was stepped down.
Justice Tsammani: We would need to leave because the time is gone and if not for time we would have played this video because if it was a document we would have moved on to listen, what’s the difference with a video as long as it’s from the witness.
There’s no difference.
Justice Ugo: Exactly, none, we just wasted time arguing. The video would have been played today.
Justice Tsammani: The court would be adjourned to tomorrow 10th June 2023 2pm
SAN Olujimi: Some of us are going to watch movies on Saturday
Justice Ugo: You can watch from
Your house.
Justice Tsammani: Okutepa bring blue flash drives tomorrow
SAN Okutepa: No it would be red card for Arsenal
Justice Tsammani: I’m blues oh
You better look around your surroundings before you talk bad about Chelsea π€£π€£π€£
Justice Tsammani is a Chelsea fan,
Such a sad moment π€£π€£π€£
I wonder how he was breathing all through this EPL season, he’s such a strong man ππ€£π
Up Chelsea the strongest team in the EPL π€£π€£π€£
Court is getting hotter
ReplyDelete